The complete financial statements of Stora Enso Oyj for the company’s year ended December 31, 2009, are available at the company’s website (www.storaenso.com). Refer to Stora Enso’s financial statements and accompanying notes and answer the following questions.
Instructions
(a) Identify all income tax
accounts reported on the December 31, 2009 statement of financial position.
Explain clearly what each account represents.
(b) What are the temporary
differences that existed at December 31, 2009, and resulted in the deferred
taxes? Which of these differences might relate to the deferred tax assets and
which ones to the deferred tax liabilities? Explain the reasons for your
answers.
(c) Reconcile the opening
balance to the closing balance for the income taxes receivable (payable) account
and the deferred tax accounts for the year ended December 31, 2009. What are the
major transactions causing the balance to change from January 1 to December
31?
(d) Does Stora Enso’s
management think it is probable that the benefits related to future deductible
amounts will be realized? Explain. Discuss the valuation allowance for the
deferred taxes and how the company arrived at this valuation allowance. What are
the gross amounts of the loss carryforwards that the company has available and
what are the expiry dates for these losses?
(e) Has Stora Enso applied
intraperiod tax allocation in 2009? Explain.
(f) How much income tax did
Stora Enso pay in 2009? Where did you find this information?
(g) What was the effective
tax rate for Stora Enso in 2009? In 2008? In 2007? What were the major causes of
the differences between the statutory and effective tax rates for 2009 and 2008?
For each reason you give, explain whether the effective rate was made higher or
lower than the statutory rate.
This was taken from the
financial statements of Stora Enso Oyj for the year
ended December 31, 2009. (All amounts in
millions of euros.)
(a)
Balance Sheet: millions of
EUR
Deferred taxes
(non-current asset)
155.8
Tax receivable
(current asset) 2.4
Deferred taxes
(long-term liability) 364.4
Tax liabilities
(current liability) 108.1
Under IFRS,
deferred taxes can only be classified as non-current. The deferred tax asset
represents the expected amount of the reduction in the amount of the taxes that
will be paid in the future when the temporary differences giving rise to future
deductible amounts reverse. The deferred tax liability represents the amount of
the taxes that are expected to be paid in the future when the temporary
differences giving rise to future taxable amounts reverse. The tax liabilities
account represents the amount still owing to the government as of December 31,
2009, and the tax receivable account represents overpayment of taxes and still
receivable as a refund from the government as of December 31, 2009.
(b)
(From note 10)
Deferred tax
assets
(in millions of
EUR)
Fixed asset depreciation
differences |
416.9 |
Untaxed
provisions |
-1.6 |
Pension
provisions |
-25.4 |
Other
provisions |
-90.0 |
Unrealized internal
profits |
-3.8 |
Tax losses carried
forward |
-431.2 |
Other |
-41.4 |
Less: valuation
allowance |
383.8 |
|
207.3 |
Deferred taxes in equity
(related to OCI) |
|
Available for sale
investments (FV-OCI) |
2.5 |
Derivative financial
instruments |
-1.2 |
Total deferred
taxes |
208.6 |
Shown on statement of
financial position as: |
|
Liabilities |
364.4 |
Assets |
-155.8 |
The fixed asset depreciation
is included in the deferred tax liabilities account since it is a large positive
balance and we know that generally tax write offs of assets are faster than
accounting depreciation rates. The pension provisions and unrealized holding
gain/loss provisions along with the tax loss carryforwards, net of the valuation
allowance are included in deferred tax assets. All of these represent future
deductions that might be available to the company to reduce future taxes
payable. This results in a possible benefit. It is not possible to reconcile
the split perfectly between assets and liabilities, as a result a portion of the
“other provisions” and “other” impact both the asset and liability accounts. It
is also not possible to determine if any of these amounts will reverse in the
next 12 months.
(c)
In millions of EUR (From
Note 10)
|
Current
Tax |
Deferred
Tax |
Balance Jan
1 |
79.8 |
203.0 |
Translation
differences |
1.1 |
13.7 |
Companies
acquired |
-2.8 |
-13.2 |
Companies
divested |
0.1 |
|
OCI |
|
65.5 |
Pension actuarial
movement |
|
-5.4 |
Equity
hedging |
4.1 |
|
Income statement –
continuing operations |
46.4 |
-55.0 |
Income statement –
discontinued operations |
|
|
Equity accounts –
investments |
-20.0 |
|
Taxes received (paid)
|
-3.0 |
|
Balance – December 31,
2009 |
105.7 |
208.6 |
The largest adjustments are
the OCI adjustment for deferred taxes, the amount of the current tax provision
for the current net income and the adjustment for investments.
(d)
As discussed in Note 10, the
company has recognized tax benefits related to loss carryforwards in the amount
of EUR 431.2 million. In addition, the company has recognized a valuation
allowance of EUR 298.7 million related to these benefits, and EUR 85.1 relating
to deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences. As described in Note
11, the valuation allowance increased by EUR 180 million as a result of the
current trading position of the company (ie. its net losses) and the general
economic conditions.
The company states that this
valuation allowance has been determined using probabilities of future profits
arising in the relevant jurisdictions. Stora Enso has the following gross
losses available for carry forward:
millions of
EUR |
Expiry
date |
629 |
No expiry
date |
28 |
2010 –
2014 |
963 |
2015 and
later |
Total 1620 |
|
(e)
Stora Enso has allocated tax
within the period to continuing operations, OCI items, pension actuarial
adjustments ( directly in equity) and equity hedging (also directly in equity).
In 2008, the company had also allocated a portion of taxes to the discontinued
operations.
(f)
The actual amount of income
taxes paid was EUR3 million. This was disclosed in two places: on the cash
flow statement as an operating cash flow and in note 10 in the reconciliation of
current taxes.
(g)
As found in Note 10, the
statutory tax rate for Stora
Enso was 28.3% in 2009, 26.2% in 2008 and 23.3% in 2007. The effective tax
rates were: 1% in 2009, 24% in 2008 and 36.6% in 2007. The major causes of the
differences between the statutory and effective tax rates and the amounts are
presented below.
|
2009
% |
2008
% |
Income tax expense at
statutory rates |
28.3 |
26.2 |
Non deductible expenses and
tax exempt income |
-10.4 |
3.0 |
Valuation allowances on
deferred tax assets |
-19.1 |
-9.4 |
Provision for and settlement
of tax cases |
2.4 |
6.9 |
Tax rate
changes |
-0.1 |
4.7 |
Impairment of
goodwill |
-0.1 |
-7.4 |
|
1.0 |
24.0 |
No comments:
Post a Comment